Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 25/100 | 75/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
123K
Completed sessions
36,494,254
5,811,026
Token share
19.1%
0.53%
Tokens
184T-6%
5.1T+100%
AUG 15OCT 9
AUG 15OCT 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.5%418K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba Large