Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 73/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 62/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
10K
24K
Completed sessions
61,680
455,272
Token share
0.01%
0.02%
Tokens
80B+100%
158B+100%
AUG 15OCT 9
AUG 15OCT 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending